Iraq vs Latvia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Iraq
- Latvia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 5,096 t against 4,619 t in Latvia, a difference of 477 t.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Iraq ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 107th of 185 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,259 t | 8,775 t | 7,515 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 2,123 t | 5,189 t | 3,066 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2,870 t | 4,900 t | 2,030 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 4,761 t | 4,837 t | 76.69 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Iraq or Latvia?
- Iraq, at 5,096 t against 4,619 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Iraq and Latvia?
- 477 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Latvia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Iraq ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 107th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).