Italy vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Italy
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 75,202 t against 71,708 t in Italy, a difference of 3,494 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 19th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 18th of 200 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 98,923 t | 70,960 t | 27,963 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 108,309 t | 79,393 t | 28,916 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 112,756 t | 83,350 t | 29,406 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 110,972 t | 75,754 t | 35,218 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Italy or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 75,202 t against 71,708 t in Italy as of 1991.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Italy and Yugoslav SFR?
- 3,494 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Italy and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Italy ranks 19th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 18th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).