Japan vs Romania: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- Romania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 44,023 t against 39,883 t in Romania, a difference of 4,140 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Japan ranks 29th and Romania ranks 32nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27,523 t | 66,740 t | 39,217 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 39,837 t | 88,696 t | 48,859 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 49,608 t | 115,943 t | 66,335 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 50,651 t | 77,829 t | 27,178 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 46,270 t | 55,360 t | 9,090 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 43,644 t | 47,485 t | 3,841 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 44,621 t | 41,267 t | 3,354 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Japan or Romania?
- Japan, at 44,023 t against 39,883 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Japan and Romania?
- 4,140 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Romania rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 29th and Romania ranks 32nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).