Kuwait vs Mauritania: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kuwait
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 1,722 t against 1,577 t in Kuwait, a difference of 145 t.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 138th and Mauritania ranks 135th of 200 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 70.79 t | 942.46 t | 871.67 t | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 133.2 t | 803.43 t | 670.23 t | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 449.45 t | 858.27 t | 408.82 t | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 513.77 t | 1,054 t | 540.66 t | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 812.87 t | 1,370 t | 556.97 t | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 1,235 t | 1,574 t | 339.34 t | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 1,525 t | 1,707 t | 182.06 t | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Kuwait or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 1,722 t against 1,577 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Kuwait and Mauritania?
- 145 t, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Mauritania rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Kuwait ranks 138th and Mauritania ranks 135th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).