Lebanon vs Sierra Leone: Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lebanon
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 1,703 t against 1,675 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 28 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Lebanon ranks 136th and Sierra Leone ranks 137th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 216.46 t | 217.93 t | 1.47 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 280.68 t | 272.4 t | 8.28 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 737.65 t | 384.86 t | 352.8 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 823.51 t | 472.04 t | 351.47 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 993.13 t | 350.62 t | 642.5 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 1,607 t | 1,081 t | 525.76 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 1,697 t | 1,696 t | 1.44 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland phosphorus, Lebanon or Sierra Leone?
- Lebanon, at 1,703 t against 1,675 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland phosphorus between Lebanon and Sierra Leone?
- 28 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Sierra Leone rank globally for manure applied β cropland phosphorus?
- Lebanon ranks 136th and Sierra Leone ranks 137th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).