Malawi vs Peru: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malawi
- Peru
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 35,208 t against 29,323 t in Peru, a difference of 5,885 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Malawi ranks 38th and Peru ranks 41st of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 697.63 t | 11,510 t | 10,813 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 980.33 t | 13,977 t | 12,997 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 1,282 t | 15,519 t | 14,237 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 1,679 t | 16,798 t | 15,120 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 3,226 t | 21,608 t | 18,382 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 14,787 t | 25,869 t | 11,082 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 31,744 t | 28,736 t | 3,008 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Malawi or Peru?
- Malawi, at 35,208 t against 29,323 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Malawi and Peru?
- 5,885 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Malawi ranks 38th and Peru ranks 41st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).