Malaysia vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Malaysia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 24,779 t against 22,659 t in Malaysia, a difference of 2,120 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 49th and Uganda ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,148 t | 1,328 t | 3,819 t | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 6,945 t | 2,054 t | 4,891 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 9,288 t | 3,106 t | 6,182 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 11,753 t | 7,406 t | 4,347 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 15,987 t | 11,099 t | 4,889 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 20,981 t | 18,331 t | 2,650 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 22,141 t | 24,264 t | 2,122 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Malaysia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 24,779 t against 22,659 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Malaysia and Uganda?
- 2,120 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Malaysia ranks 49th and Uganda ranks 47th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).