Melanesia vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Melanesia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 77,094 t against 8,367 t in Melanesia, a difference of 68,727 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 9.2 times Melanesia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 15th of 18 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,099 t | 28,916 t | 22,817 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 7,433 t | 33,790 t | 26,357 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 8,017 t | 58,346 t | 50,329 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 8,129 t | 74,173 t | 66,044 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Melanesia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 77,094 t against 8,367 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Melanesia and Uzbekistan?
- 68,727 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Melanesia ranks 12th and Uzbekistan ranks 15th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).