Montenegro vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Montenegro
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 990.19 t against 968.01 t in Montenegro, a difference of 22.18 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Montenegro ranks 153rd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd of 200 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,282 t | 1,514 t | 232.48 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 1,115 t | 1,227 t | 111.9 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | 971.91 t | 1,036 t | 63.61 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Montenegro or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 990.19 t against 968.01 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Montenegro and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 22.18 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Montenegro ranks 153rd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).