Nigeria vs Thailand: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nigeria
- Thailand
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 51,851 t against 45,263 t in Thailand, a difference of 6,588 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.
Nigeria ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 30th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,553 t | 37,959 t | 32,406 t | Thailand |
| 1970s | 7,704 t | 41,701 t | 33,997 t | Thailand |
| 1980s | 12,680 t | 46,151 t | 33,471 t | Thailand |
| 1990s | 23,808 t | 52,395 t | 28,587 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 33,932 t | 47,668 t | 13,736 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 41,676 t | 46,635 t | 4,959 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | 51,094 t | 45,303 t | 5,791 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Nigeria or Thailand?
- Nigeria, at 51,851 t against 45,263 t in Thailand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Nigeria and Thailand?
- 6,588 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Thailand rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Nigeria ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 30th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).