North Macedonia vs Sri Lanka: Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus over time
- North Macedonia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 2,613 t against 2,383 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 230 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 131st and Sri Lanka ranks 128th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,126 t | 2,914 t | 1,211 t | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 3,529 t | 2,262 t | 1,268 t | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 3,312 t | 2,646 t | 665.85 t | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 2,628 t | 2,831 t | 202.5 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland phosphorus, North Macedonia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 2,613 t against 2,383 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland phosphorus between North Macedonia and Sri Lanka?
- 230 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Sri Lanka rank globally for manure applied β cropland phosphorus?
- North Macedonia ranks 131st and Sri Lanka ranks 128th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).