Pakistan vs Russian Federation: Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Pakistan
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 290,324 t against 222,668 t in Pakistan, a difference of 67,656 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 200 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74,891 t | 467,356 t | 392,464 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 97,924 t | 287,034 t | 189,110 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 149,221 t | 277,460 t | 128,239 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 206,492 t | 286,864 t | 80,372 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland phosphorus, Pakistan or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 290,324 t against 222,668 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland phosphorus between Pakistan and Russian Federation?
- 67,656 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Pakistan and Russian Federation rank globally for manure applied β cropland phosphorus?
- Pakistan ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).