Puerto Rico vs Qatar: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Puerto Rico
- Qatar
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 787.57 t against 769.28 t in Qatar, a difference of 18.29 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 157th and Qatar ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,969 t | 2.89 t | 1,966 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1970s | 2,408 t | 7.36 t | 2,400 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 2,111 t | 34.82 t | 2,076 t | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 1,890 t | 87.3 t | 1,803 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 1,383 t | 121.08 t | 1,262 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 1,110 t | 315.53 t | 794.55 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 853.11 t | 692.38 t | 160.73 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Puerto Rico or Qatar?
- Puerto Rico, at 787.57 t against 769.28 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Puerto Rico and Qatar?
- 18.29 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Qatar rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Puerto Rico ranks 157th and Qatar ranks 158th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).