Rwanda vs Slovenia: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus

Rwanda
3,275 t
in 2023
Slovenia
3,167 t
in 2023
Rwanda rank
124th
Slovenia rank
125th

Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Rwanda
  • Slovenia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 3,275 t against 3,167 t in Slovenia, a difference of 108 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 124th and Slovenia ranks 125th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 807.04 t 4,613 t 3,806 t Slovenia
2000s 1,894 t 4,037 t 2,142 t Slovenia
2010s 5,109 t 3,472 t 1,637 t Rwanda
2020s 4,499 t 3,323 t 1,176 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Rwanda or Slovenia?
Rwanda, at 3,275 t against 3,167 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Rwanda and Slovenia?
108 t, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Slovenia rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
Rwanda ranks 124th and Slovenia ranks 125th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).