Serbia vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Serbia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 15,132 t against 14,443 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 689 t.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 66th and Tajikistan ranks 68th of 200 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23,103 t | 8,818 t | 14,285 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 20,240 t | 12,094 t | 8,146 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 17,550 t | 14,256 t | 3,294 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Serbia or Tajikistan?
- Serbia, at 15,132 t against 14,443 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 689 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Serbia ranks 66th and Tajikistan ranks 68th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).