Slovenia vs Zimbabwe: Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus
Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Slovenia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 3,675 t against 3,167 t in Slovenia, a difference of 508 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,613 t | 2,863 t | 1,750 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 4,037 t | 3,070 t | 967.25 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3,472 t | 3,260 t | 212 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 3,323 t | 3,423 t | 99.95 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland phosphorus, Slovenia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 3,675 t against 3,167 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland phosphorus between Slovenia and Zimbabwe?
- 508 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for manure applied — cropland phosphorus?
- Slovenia ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).