Armenia vs Canada: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Canada
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 6.45 kg/ha against 6.14 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 138th and Canada ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.23 kg/ha | 6.07 kg/ha | 0.8433 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2000s | 5.64 kg/ha | 6.47 kg/ha | 0.8349 kg/ha | Canada |
| 2010s | 6.7 kg/ha | 6.17 kg/ha | 0.5331 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 7.02 kg/ha | 6.18 kg/ha | 0.8406 kg/ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Armenia or Canada?
- Armenia, at 6.45 kg/ha against 6.14 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Armenia and Canada?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Canada?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Canada rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 138th and Canada ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).