Azerbaijan vs Kiribati: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 5.1 kg/ha against 4.83 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 166th and Kiribati ranks 164th of 200 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.65 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | 3.13 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 6.37 kg/ha | 3.87 kg/ha | 2.49 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 6.25 kg/ha | 4.73 kg/ha | 1.52 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 5.08 kg/ha | 5.06 kg/ha | 0.0147 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 5.1 kg/ha against 4.83 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Kiribati?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kiribati?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Kiribati rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 166th and Kiribati ranks 164th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).