Belarus vs Nicaragua: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 33.2 kg/ha against 32.61 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 0.59 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.13 kg/ha | 11.23 kg/ha | 25.9 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 31.3 kg/ha | 23.59 kg/ha | 7.7 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 32.92 kg/ha | 30.62 kg/ha | 2.3 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 32.45 kg/ha | 33.03 kg/ha | 0.5823 kg/ha | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 33.2 kg/ha against 32.61 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 0.59 kg/ha, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 57th and Nicaragua ranks 56th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).