Belize vs Yemen: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belize
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 5.38 kg/ha against 5.27 kg/ha in Belize, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 162nd and Yemen ranks 160th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 6 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.97 kg/ha | 2.5 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1970s | 7.79 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | 5.97 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1980s | 8.56 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 6.27 kg/ha | Belize |
| 1990s | 4.72 kg/ha | 2.43 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2000s | 4.71 kg/ha | 3.68 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2010s | 5.47 kg/ha | 4.86 kg/ha | 0.6132 kg/ha | Belize |
| 2020s | 5.24 kg/ha | 5.36 kg/ha | 0.128 kg/ha | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Belize or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 5.38 kg/ha against 5.27 kg/ha in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Belize and Yemen?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Yemen rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belize ranks 162nd and Yemen ranks 160th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).