Burundi vs Cuba: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 9.53 kg/ha against 9.12 kg/ha in Burundi, a difference of 0.41 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Burundi ranks 133rd and Cuba ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.18 kg/ha | 23.58 kg/ha | 22.41 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 1.55 kg/ha | 14.75 kg/ha | 13.2 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1.48 kg/ha | 13.58 kg/ha | 12.09 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 1.53 kg/ha | 10.99 kg/ha | 9.47 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.76 kg/ha | 9.64 kg/ha | 7.88 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4.48 kg/ha | 10.62 kg/ha | 6.14 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 8.04 kg/ha | 8.65 kg/ha | 0.6182 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Burundi or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 9.53 kg/ha against 9.12 kg/ha in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Burundi and Cuba?
- 0.41 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Cuba rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 133rd and Cuba ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).