Cabo Verde vs Lithuania: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cabo Verde
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 13.48 kg/ha against 13.06 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 115th and Lithuania ranks 117th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.88 kg/ha | 25.15 kg/ha | 8.72 kg/ha | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 23.79 kg/ha | 25.42 kg/ha | 1.63 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 14.82 kg/ha | 17.35 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 13.28 kg/ha | 13.57 kg/ha | 0.2866 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Cabo Verde or Lithuania?
- Cabo Verde, at 13.48 kg/ha against 13.06 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Cabo Verde and Lithuania?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Lithuania rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cabo Verde ranks 115th and Lithuania ranks 117th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).