Cabo Verde vs Luxembourg: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cabo Verde
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 92.89 kg/ha against 13.48 kg/ha in Cabo Verde, a difference of 79.41 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 6.9 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 29 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.79 kg/ha | 91.38 kg/ha | 67.59 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 14.82 kg/ha | 93.37 kg/ha | 78.54 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 13.28 kg/ha | 93.61 kg/ha | 80.33 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Cabo Verde or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 92.89 kg/ha against 13.48 kg/ha in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Cabo Verde and Luxembourg?
- 79.41 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Luxembourg rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cabo Verde ranks 16th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).