Cabo Verde vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cabo Verde
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 89.01 kg/ha against 13.48 kg/ha in Cabo Verde, a difference of 75.53 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 6.6 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 16th and Tajikistan ranks 18th of 29 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.88 kg/ha | 44.09 kg/ha | 10.21 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 23.79 kg/ha | 55.56 kg/ha | 31.76 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 14.82 kg/ha | 84.72 kg/ha | 69.89 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 13.28 kg/ha | 89.25 kg/ha | 75.97 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Cabo Verde or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 89.01 kg/ha against 13.48 kg/ha in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Cabo Verde and Tajikistan?
- 75.53 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cabo Verde ranks 16th and Tajikistan ranks 18th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).