Chad vs Israel: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chad
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 13.82 kg/ha against 13.2 kg/ha in Chad, a difference of 0.62 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 116th and Israel ranks 113th of 200 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.57 kg/ha | 4.25 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1970s | 2.37 kg/ha | 7.07 kg/ha | 4.7 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1980s | 2.91 kg/ha | 9.17 kg/ha | 6.26 kg/ha | Israel |
| 1990s | 4.22 kg/ha | 9.02 kg/ha | 4.8 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2000s | 6.46 kg/ha | 11.95 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2010s | 8.66 kg/ha | 12.87 kg/ha | 4.21 kg/ha | Israel |
| 2020s | 12.12 kg/ha | 14.17 kg/ha | 2.04 kg/ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Chad or Israel?
- Israel, at 13.82 kg/ha against 13.2 kg/ha in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Chad and Israel?
- 0.62 kg/ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Israel?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Israel rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chad ranks 116th and Israel ranks 113th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).