Chile vs Serbia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area

Chile
23.4 kg/ha
in 2023
Serbia
22.66 kg/ha
in 2023
Chile rank
73rd
Serbia rank
75th

Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Chile
  • Serbia
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 23.4 kg/ha against 22.66 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.74 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Chile ranks 73rd and Serbia ranks 75th of 200 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 24.21 kg/ha 34.5 kg/ha 10.29 kg/ha Serbia
2010s 22.67 kg/ha 29.5 kg/ha 6.84 kg/ha Serbia
2020s 23.38 kg/ha 25.74 kg/ha 2.35 kg/ha Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Serbia?
Chile, at 23.4 kg/ha against 22.66 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Serbia?
0.74 kg/ha, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
Chile ranks 73rd and Serbia ranks 75th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).