Costa Rica vs Luxembourg: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Costa Rica
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 92.89 kg/ha against 86.57 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 6.32 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 185 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.05 kg/ha | 91.38 kg/ha | 23.34 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 81.08 kg/ha | 93.37 kg/ha | 12.29 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 82.85 kg/ha | 93.61 kg/ha | 10.76 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Costa Rica or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 92.89 kg/ha against 86.57 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 6.32 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Luxembourg rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Luxembourg ranks 17th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).