Costa Rica vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area

Costa Rica
86.57 kg/ha
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
12.13 kg/ha
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
19th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
8th

Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 86.57 kg/ha against 12.13 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 74.44 kg/ha.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 7.1 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 19th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 8th of 184 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 20.2 kg/ha 6.31 kg/ha 13.89 kg/ha Costa Rica
1970s 30.77 kg/ha 7.11 kg/ha 23.66 kg/ha Costa Rica
1980s 34 kg/ha 7.93 kg/ha 26.08 kg/ha Costa Rica
1990s 48.43 kg/ha 8.88 kg/ha 39.56 kg/ha Costa Rica
2000s 68.05 kg/ha 10.21 kg/ha 57.84 kg/ha Costa Rica
2010s 81.08 kg/ha 11.51 kg/ha 69.56 kg/ha Costa Rica
2020s 82.85 kg/ha 11.98 kg/ha 70.87 kg/ha Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Costa Rica or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Costa Rica, at 86.57 kg/ha against 12.13 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Costa Rica and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
74.44 kg/ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 8th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/costa-rica/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/costa-rica/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Costa Rica vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).