Costa Rica vs Tajikistan: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Costa Rica
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 89.01 kg/ha against 86.57 kg/ha in Costa Rica, a difference of 2.44 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 19th and Tajikistan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.45 kg/ha | 44.09 kg/ha | 6.37 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 68.05 kg/ha | 55.56 kg/ha | 12.49 kg/ha | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 81.08 kg/ha | 84.72 kg/ha | 3.64 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 82.85 kg/ha | 89.25 kg/ha | 6.4 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Costa Rica or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 89.01 kg/ha against 86.57 kg/ha in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Costa Rica and Tajikistan?
- 2.44 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Tajikistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Costa Rica ranks 19th and Tajikistan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).