Cyprus vs Estonia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cyprus
- Estonia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 21.84 kg/ha against 20.99 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.85 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Cyprus ranks 77th and Estonia ranks 80th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.1 kg/ha | 31.36 kg/ha | 7.27 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 28.45 kg/ha | 28.65 kg/ha | 0.2075 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 29.04 kg/ha | 24.33 kg/ha | 4.71 kg/ha | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 24.93 kg/ha | 21.74 kg/ha | 3.19 kg/ha | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Cyprus or Estonia?
- Cyprus, at 21.84 kg/ha against 20.99 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Cyprus and Estonia?
- 0.85 kg/ha, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Estonia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cyprus ranks 77th and Estonia ranks 80th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).