Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.6789 kg/ha
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
0.6693 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
17th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
18th

Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 0.6789 kg/ha against 0.6693 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.0096 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 17th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 18th of 18 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7891 kg/ha 0.2589 kg/ha 0.5302 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 0.9911 kg/ha 0.3804 kg/ha 0.6106 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 1.13 kg/ha 0.5527 kg/ha 0.573 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 1.54 kg/ha 0.6308 kg/ha 0.907 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 1.36 kg/ha 0.8375 kg/ha 0.525 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 0.7898 kg/ha 0.7615 kg/ha 0.0282 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 0.6933 kg/ha 0.6804 kg/ha 0.0129 kg/ha Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 0.6789 kg/ha against 0.6693 kg/ha in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
0.0096 kg/ha, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 17th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 18th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).