Ecuador vs North Macedonia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 27.07 kg/ha against 26.71 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.36 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 65th of 200 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.3 kg/ha | 32.04 kg/ha | 8.74 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 28 kg/ha | 36.59 kg/ha | 8.59 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 29.54 kg/ha | 41.47 kg/ha | 11.93 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 27.11 kg/ha | 31.66 kg/ha | 4.55 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Ecuador or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 27.07 kg/ha against 26.71 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Ecuador and North Macedonia?
- 0.36 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and North Macedonia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and North Macedonia ranks 65th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).