Ecuador vs South Sudan, Republic of: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan, Republic of
How they compare
South Sudan, Republic of currently reports 27.38 kg/ha against 26.71 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.67 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 63rd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 60th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Sudan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.88 kg/ha | 24.1 kg/ha | 4.78 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 27.11 kg/ha | 27.6 kg/ha | 0.4913 kg/ha | South Sudan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Ecuador or South Sudan, Republic of?
- South Sudan, Republic of, at 27.38 kg/ha against 26.71 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Ecuador and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 0.67 kg/ha, with South Sudan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan, Republic of rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 63rd and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 60th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).