Egypt vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Egypt
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 5.89 kg/ha against 5.49 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.4 kg/ha.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Egypt ranks 142nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 145th of 184 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.02 kg/ha | 3.96 kg/ha | 0.0536 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1970s | 5.15 kg/ha | 3.82 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1980s | 6.38 kg/ha | 4.42 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 1990s | 7.06 kg/ha | 5.38 kg/ha | 1.68 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Egypt or Ethiopia PDR?
- Egypt, at 5.89 kg/ha against 5.49 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Egypt and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.4 kg/ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Egypt and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Egypt ranks 142nd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 145th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).