Eritrea vs Georgia: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 10.98 kg/ha against 10.45 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.53 kg/ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Georgia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 125th and Georgia ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8 kg/ha | 6.58 kg/ha | 1.21 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 9.31 kg/ha | 10.42 kg/ha | 1.11 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 10.01 kg/ha | 11.13 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 10.44 kg/ha | 11.22 kg/ha | 0.7855 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 10.98 kg/ha against 10.45 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Georgia?
- 0.53 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Georgia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Georgia rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 125th and Georgia ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).