Eritrea vs Madagascar: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Madagascar
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10.45 kg/ha against 9.88 kg/ha in Madagascar, a difference of 0.57 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Madagascar ahead.
Eritrea ranks 116th and Madagascar ranks 119th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8 kg/ha | 9.15 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 9.31 kg/ha | 7.31 kg/ha | 2 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 10.01 kg/ha | 9.18 kg/ha | 0.827 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 10.44 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Madagascar?
- Eritrea, at 10.45 kg/ha against 9.88 kg/ha in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Madagascar?
- 0.57 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Madagascar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Madagascar rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 116th and Madagascar ranks 119th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).