Eritrea vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 10.92 kg/ha against 10.45 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.47 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 115th and Papua New Guinea ranks 113th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8 kg/ha | 10.57 kg/ha | 2.77 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 9.31 kg/ha | 11.58 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 10.01 kg/ha | 11.02 kg/ha | 1.01 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 10.44 kg/ha | 10.72 kg/ha | 0.283 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 10.92 kg/ha against 10.45 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.47 kg/ha, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Papua New Guinea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 115th and Papua New Guinea ranks 113th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).