Estonia vs Panama: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Panama
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 20.99 kg/ha against 19.81 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 1.18 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 80th and Panama ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.36 kg/ha | 14.68 kg/ha | 16.68 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 28.65 kg/ha | 16.6 kg/ha | 12.05 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 24.33 kg/ha | 18.37 kg/ha | 5.96 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 21.74 kg/ha | 19.49 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Panama?
- Estonia, at 20.99 kg/ha against 19.81 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Panama?
- 1.18 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Panama rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 80th and Panama ranks 82nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).