Ethiopia PDR vs Lesotho: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Lesotho
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 5.49 kg/ha against 5.37 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 158th and Lesotho ranks 161st of 200 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.96 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | 0.5131 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 3.82 kg/ha | 5.83 kg/ha | 2.01 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 4.42 kg/ha | 6.92 kg/ha | 2.5 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 5.38 kg/ha | 6.25 kg/ha | 0.8736 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Lesotho?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 5.49 kg/ha against 5.37 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 1992.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Lesotho?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Lesotho?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Lesotho rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 158th and Lesotho ranks 161st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).