Fiji vs Norway: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Fiji
- Norway
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 19.65 kg/ha against 19.48 kg/ha in Norway, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Fiji ranks 84th and Norway ranks 87th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.84 kg/ha | 26.46 kg/ha | 18.62 kg/ha | Norway |
| 1970s | 11.53 kg/ha | 23.61 kg/ha | 12.08 kg/ha | Norway |
| 1980s | 12.53 kg/ha | 22.27 kg/ha | 9.73 kg/ha | Norway |
| 1990s | 14.78 kg/ha | 20.41 kg/ha | 5.64 kg/ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 20.24 kg/ha | 20.02 kg/ha | 0.2197 kg/ha | Fiji |
| 2010s | 19.03 kg/ha | 19.95 kg/ha | 0.9235 kg/ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 17.14 kg/ha | 19.85 kg/ha | 2.71 kg/ha | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Fiji or Norway?
- Fiji, at 19.65 kg/ha against 19.48 kg/ha in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Fiji and Norway?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Norway rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Fiji ranks 84th and Norway ranks 87th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).