Georgia vs Lebanon: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 10.98 kg/ha against 10.56 kg/ha in Lebanon, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 122nd and Lebanon ranks 124th of 200 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.89 kg/ha | 5.14 kg/ha | 1.74 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 10.42 kg/ha | 6.46 kg/ha | 3.96 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 11.13 kg/ha | 10.4 kg/ha | 0.7293 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 11.22 kg/ha | 10.45 kg/ha | 0.7727 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Lebanon?
- Georgia, at 10.98 kg/ha against 10.56 kg/ha in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Lebanon?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lebanon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Lebanon rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 122nd and Lebanon ranks 124th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).