Georgia vs Lithuania: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 13.06 kg/ha against 10.98 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 2.08 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 113th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.89 kg/ha | 25.15 kg/ha | 18.27 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 10.42 kg/ha | 25.42 kg/ha | 15 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 11.13 kg/ha | 17.35 kg/ha | 6.22 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 11.22 kg/ha | 13.57 kg/ha | 2.35 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 13.06 kg/ha against 10.98 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Lithuania?
- 2.08 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Lithuania rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 113th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).