Georgia vs Papua New Guinea: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 10.98 kg/ha against 10.92 kg/ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Georgia ranks 113th and Papua New Guinea ranks 114th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.89 kg/ha | 10.38 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 10.42 kg/ha | 11.58 kg/ha | 1.16 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 11.13 kg/ha | 11.02 kg/ha | 0.1104 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 11.22 kg/ha | 10.72 kg/ha | 0.5025 kg/ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Papua New Guinea?
- Georgia, at 10.98 kg/ha against 10.92 kg/ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 113th and Papua New Guinea ranks 114th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).