Haiti vs Peru: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 15 kg/ha against 14.92 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Haiti ranks 108th and Peru ranks 106th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.01 kg/ha | 18.13 kg/ha | 4.12 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 18.07 kg/ha | 15.46 kg/ha | 2.61 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 1980s | 10.8 kg/ha | 12.88 kg/ha | 2.08 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1990s | 11.82 kg/ha | 11.14 kg/ha | 0.6857 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2000s | 14.87 kg/ha | 13.52 kg/ha | 1.34 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2010s | 12.55 kg/ha | 15.26 kg/ha | 2.71 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 14.88 kg/ha | 14.5 kg/ha | 0.3735 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Haiti or Peru?
- Peru, at 15 kg/ha against 14.92 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Haiti and Peru?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Peru rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 108th and Peru ranks 106th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).