Israel vs Lithuania: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Israel
- Lithuania
How they compare
Israel currently reports 13.82 kg/ha against 13.06 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.76 kg/ha.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Israel ranks 107th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.31 kg/ha | 25.15 kg/ha | 15.84 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 11.95 kg/ha | 25.42 kg/ha | 13.47 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 12.87 kg/ha | 17.35 kg/ha | 4.48 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 14.17 kg/ha | 13.57 kg/ha | 0.6022 kg/ha | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Israel or Lithuania?
- Israel, at 13.82 kg/ha against 13.06 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Israel and Lithuania?
- 0.76 kg/ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Lithuania rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Israel ranks 107th and Lithuania ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).