Jordan vs Rwanda: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Jordan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 6.49 kg/ha against 6.38 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Jordan ranks 149th and Rwanda ranks 151st of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.935 kg/ha | 2 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 1.94 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | 0.2252 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 2.11 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 0.2308 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 3.67 kg/ha | 2.58 kg/ha | 1.09 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2000s | 4.61 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 0.4238 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2010s | 5.08 kg/ha | 8.63 kg/ha | 3.55 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 6.19 kg/ha | 7.84 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Jordan or Rwanda?
- Jordan, at 6.49 kg/ha against 6.38 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Jordan and Rwanda?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Rwanda rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Jordan ranks 149th and Rwanda ranks 151st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).