Kazakhstan vs Sudan (former): Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 7.17 kg/ha against 6.96 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Sudan (former) ranks 146th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Sudan (former) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.58 kg/ha | 5.05 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 6.44 kg/ha | 7.32 kg/ha | 0.8815 kg/ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 7.66 kg/ha | 7.24 kg/ha | 0.4183 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 7.17 kg/ha against 6.96 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan (former) rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Sudan (former) ranks 146th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).