Kazakhstan vs Thailand: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 7.25 kg/ha against 6.96 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.29 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Thailand ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Thailand ranks 145th of 200 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.58 kg/ha | 11.34 kg/ha | 3.75 kg/ha | Thailand |
| 2000s | 6.44 kg/ha | 8.67 kg/ha | 2.23 kg/ha | Thailand |
| 2010s | 7.46 kg/ha | 7.75 kg/ha | 0.2898 kg/ha | Thailand |
| 2020s | 6.88 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 0.3727 kg/ha | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 7.25 kg/ha against 6.96 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Thailand?
- 0.29 kg/ha, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Thailand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Thailand rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 147th and Thailand ranks 145th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).