Kenya vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kenya
- Uganda
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 9.64 kg/ha against 8.86 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.78 kg/ha.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 121st and Uganda ranks 124th of 185 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.93 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | 3.33 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1970s | 5.64 kg/ha | 1.97 kg/ha | 3.67 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1980s | 7.07 kg/ha | 2.16 kg/ha | 4.91 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1990s | 7.88 kg/ha | 3.56 kg/ha | 4.32 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 9.37 kg/ha | 4.91 kg/ha | 4.47 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 9.43 kg/ha | 7.04 kg/ha | 2.4 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 9.65 kg/ha | 8.73 kg/ha | 0.9169 kg/ha | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Kenya or Uganda?
- Kenya, at 9.64 kg/ha against 8.86 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Kenya and Uganda?
- 0.78 kg/ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kenya ranks 121st and Uganda ranks 124th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).