Kyrgyzstan vs Tuvalu: Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 53.55 kg/ha against 50.54 kg/ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 3.01 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Tuvalu ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.45 kg/ha | 38.71 kg/ha | 7.26 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 31.79 kg/ha | 46.95 kg/ha | 15.16 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 44.61 kg/ha | 48.35 kg/ha | 3.74 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 52.41 kg/ha | 50.13 kg/ha | 2.28 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Tuvalu?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 53.55 kg/ha against 50.54 kg/ha in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Tuvalu?
- 3.01 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Tuvalu?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Tuvalu rank globally for manure applied — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd and Tuvalu ranks 36th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).